Risk Factors for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Subsidence with Bryan Disc-A Retrospective Observational Analysis
: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is currently used instead of fusion to preserve cervical spine motion. Cervical implant subsidence is a potential complication after CDA. : Radiological measurements were recorded via patient anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in the neutral position. Subsiden...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2024-03, Vol.13 (6), p.1589 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | : Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is currently used instead of fusion to preserve cervical spine motion. Cervical implant subsidence is a potential complication after CDA.
: Radiological measurements were recorded via patient anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in the neutral position. Subsidence was defined as a decrease of 3 mm or more in functional spinal unit height (FSUH) from which was measured on a post-operative (OP) radiograph.
: This study included 104 patients who underwent 153 CDA levels with the Bryan Disc. Approximately one-quarter of the implants (22.9%) showed subsidence. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that pre-OP mean disc height (DH) was identified as an independent risk factor for subsidence in multivariate analysis (0.151, 95% Confidence Interval 0-0.073,
= 0.018). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve = 0.852, sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 77.1%) revealed a cut-off value of 4.48 mm for pre-OP Mean-DH in the risk for implant subsidence.
: In this study, the subsidence rate significantly increased when the implants were oversized beyond a pre-OP Mean-DH of approximately >4 mm. Moreover, the implant subsidence incidence was higher than that reported in previous studies. This is possibly due to endplate over-preparation or disc space over-distraction during placement at the same height as the Bryan Disc (8.5 mm). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
DOI: | 10.3390/jcm13061589 |