Risk of HBV reactivation in HCC patients undergoing combination therapy of PD-1 inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors in the antiviral era

Background Although routine antiviral therapy has been implemented in HCC patients, the risk of HBV reactivation (HBVr) remains with the use of programmed cell death-1(PD-1) blockade‐based combination immunotherapy and the relevant risk factors are also unclear. Therefore, we aimed to identify the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2024-03, Vol.150 (3), p.158-158, Article 158
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Rui, Tan, Guili, Lei, Dingjia, Li, Yadi, Gong, JiaoJiao, Tang, Yao, Pang, Hao, Luo, Huating, Qin, Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although routine antiviral therapy has been implemented in HCC patients, the risk of HBV reactivation (HBVr) remains with the use of programmed cell death-1(PD-1) blockade‐based combination immunotherapy and the relevant risk factors are also unclear. Therefore, we aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors of HBVr in HCC patients undergoing combination therapy of PD-1 inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors and concurrent first-line antivirals. Methods We included a total of 218 HBV-related HCC patients with first-line antivirals who received PD-1 inhibitors alone or together with angiogenesis inhibitors. According to the anti-tumor therapy modalities, patients were divided into PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy group (anti-PD-1 group) and combination therapy group (anti-PD-1 plus angiogenesis inhibitors group). The primary study endpoint was the incidence of HBVr. Results HBVr occurred in 16 (7.3%) of the 218 patients, 2 cases were found in the anti-PD-1 group and the remaining 14 cases were in the combination group. The Cox proportional hazard model identified 2 independent risk factors for HBVr: combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 4.608, 95%CI 1.010–21.016, P  = 0.048) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive (HR, 3.695, 95%CI 1.246–10.957, P  = 0.018). Based on the above results, we developed a simple risk-scoring system and found that the high-risk group (score = 2) developed HBVr more frequently than the low-risk group (score = 0) (Odds ratio [OR], 17.000, 95%CI 1.946–148.526, P  = 0.01). The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) was 7.06 (95%CI 0.581–0.831, P  = 0.006). Conclusion HBeAg-positive patients receiving combination therapy have a 17-fold higher risk of HBVr than HBeAg-negative patients with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy.
ISSN:1432-1335
0171-5216
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-024-05677-7