A Lewis Acid-Controlled Enantiodivergent Epoxidation of Aldehydes

Two epoxidation catalysts, one of which consists of two VANOL ligands and an aluminum and the other that consists of two VANOL ligands and a boron, were compared. Both catalysts are highly effective in the catalytic asymmetric epoxidation of a variety of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes with diazoac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACS catalysis 2023-10, Vol.13 (19), p.13117-13126
Hauptverfasser: Mohammadlou, Aliakbar, Joshi, Chetan, Smith, Brendyn P., Zheng, Li, Corio, Stephanie A., Canestraight, Virginia M., Kohlbouni, Saeedeh Torabi, Taimoory, S. Maryamdokht, Borhan, Babak, Staples, Richard, Vetticatt, Mathew J., Wulff, William D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two epoxidation catalysts, one of which consists of two VANOL ligands and an aluminum and the other that consists of two VANOL ligands and a boron, were compared. Both catalysts are highly effective in the catalytic asymmetric epoxidation of a variety of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes with diazoacetamides, giving high yields and excellent asymmetric inductions. The aluminum catalyst is effective at 0 °C and the boron catalyst at −40 °C. Although both the aluminum and boron catalysts of (R)-VANOL give very high asymmetric inductions (up to 99% ee), they give opposite enantiomers of the epoxide. The mechanism, rate- and enantioselectivity-determining step, and origin of enantiodivergence are evaluated using density functional theory calculations.
ISSN:2155-5435
2155-5435
DOI:10.1021/acscatal.3c03929