Multiple surgical resections for progressive IDH wildtype glioblastoma—is it beneficial?

Purpose The role of repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) remains equivocal. This study aims to assess the overall survival and complications rates of single or repeat resection for rGB. Methods A single-centre retrospective review of all patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma managed s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta neurochirurgica 2024-03, Vol.166 (1), p.138-138, Article 138
Hauptverfasser: Honeyman, Susan Isabel, Owen, William J., Mier, Juan, Marks, Katya, Dassanyake, Sohani N., Wood, Matthew J., Fairhead, Rory, Martinez-Soler, Pablo, Jasem, Hussain, Yarlagadda, Ananya, Roach, Joy R., Boukas, Alexandros, Stacey, Richard, Apostolopoulos, Vasileios, Plaha, Puneet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The role of repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) remains equivocal. This study aims to assess the overall survival and complications rates of single or repeat resection for rGB. Methods A single-centre retrospective review of all patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma managed surgically, between January 2014 and January 2022, was carried out. Patient survival and factors influencing prognosis were analysed, using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods. Results Four hundred thirty-two patients were included, of whom 329 underwent single resection, 83 had two resections and 20 patients underwent three resections. Median OS (mOS) in the cohort who underwent a single operation was 13.7 months (95% CI: 12.7–14.7 months). The mOS was observed to be extended in patients who underwent second or third-time resection, at 22.9 months and 44.7 months respectively ( p   95% resection or residual tumour volume of 
ISSN:0942-0940
0001-6268
0942-0940
DOI:10.1007/s00701-024-06025-x