Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA
Background Innovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective. Objective We evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) implementation of My VA Images , a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2024-02, Vol.39 (Suppl 1), p.97-105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Innovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective.
Objective
We evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) implementation of
My VA Images
, a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling established dermatology patients to receive follow-up care remotely instead of in-person.
Design /Participants/Approach
Following pilot testing at 3 facilities, the app was introduced to 28 facilities (4 groups of 7) every 3 months using a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. Using the Organizational Theory of Implementation Effectiveness, we examined the app’s implementation using qualitative and quantitative data consisting of encounter data from VA’s corporate data warehouse; app usage from VA’s Mobile Health database; bi-monthly reports from facility representatives; phone interviews with clinicians; and documented communications between the operational partner and facility staff.
Key Results
Implementation policies and practices included VA’s vision to expand home telehealth and marketing/communication strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic dominated the implementation climate by stressing staffing, introducing competing demands, and influencing stakeholder attitudes to the app, including its fit to their values. These factors were associated with mixed implementation effectiveness, defined as high quality consistent use. Nineteen of 31 exposed facilities prepared to use the app; 10 facilities used it for actual patient care, 7 as originally intended. Residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were more likely than attendings to use the app. Facilities exposed to the app pre-pandemic were more likely to use and sustain the new process.
Conclusions
Considerable heterogeneity existed in implementing mobile teledermatology, despite VA’s common mission, integrated healthcare system, and stakeholders’ broad interest. Identifying opportunities to target favorable facilities and user groups (such as teaching facilities and physician extenders, respectively) while addressing internal implementation barriers including incomplete integration with the electronic health record as well as inadequate staffing may help optimize the initial impact of direct-to-patient telehealth. The COVID pandemic was a notable extrinsic barrier.
Clinical Trials Registration
NCT03241589 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0884-8734 1525-1497 1525-1497 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11606-023-08480-1 |