Lead-Specific Performance for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Convolutional Neural Network Models Using Sinus Rhythm Electrocardiography

Background: We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) using the sinus rhythm ECG (SR-ECG). However, the diagnostic performance of the CNN model based on different ECG leads remains unclear.Methods and Results: In this retrospective analysis of a singl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation Reports 2024/03/08, Vol.6(3), pp.46-54
Hauptverfasser: Suzuki, Shinya, Motogi, Jun, Umemoto, Takuya, Hirota, Naomi, Nakai, Hiroshi, Matsuzawa, Wataru, Takayanagi, Tsuneo, Hyodo, Akira, Satoh, Keiichi, Arita, Takuto, Yagi, Naoharu, Kishi, Mikio, Semba, Hiroaki, Kano, Hiroto, Matsuno, Shunsuke, Kato, Yuko, Otsuka, Takayuki, Hori, Takayuki, Matsuhama, Minoru, Iida, Mitsuru, Uejima, Tokuhisa, Oikawa, Yuji, Yajima, Junji, Yamashita, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) using the sinus rhythm ECG (SR-ECG). However, the diagnostic performance of the CNN model based on different ECG leads remains unclear.Methods and Results: In this retrospective analysis of a single-center, prospective cohort study, we identified 616 AF cases and 3,412 SR cases for the modeling dataset among new patients (n=19,170). The modeling dataset included SR-ECGs obtained within 31 days from AF-ECGs in AF cases and SR cases with follow-up ≥1,095 days. We evaluated the CNN model’s performance for AF detection using 8-lead (I, II, and V1–6), single-lead, and double-lead ECGs through 5-fold cross-validation. The CNN model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.856–0.888) and an odds ratio of 15.24 (95% CI: 12.42–18.72) for AF detection using the eight-lead ECG. Among the single-lead and double-lead ECGs, the double-lead ECG using leads I and V1 yielded an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.856–0.886) with an odds ratio of 14.34 (95% CI: 11.64–17.67).Conclusions: We assessed the performance of a CNN model for detecting AF using eight-lead, single-lead, and double-lead SR-ECGs. The model’s performance with a double-lead (I, V1) ECG was comparable to that of the 8-lead ECG, suggesting its potential as an alternative for AF screening using SR-ECG.
ISSN:2434-0790
2434-0790
DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0068