Telepsychiatry versus face-to-face treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare significantly and telepsychiatry is now the primary means of treatment in some countries. To compare the efficacy of telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment. A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing telepsychiatry with face-to-face treatment for psyc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of psychiatry 2023-09, Vol.223 (3), p.407-414 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare significantly and telepsychiatry is now the primary means of treatment in some countries.
To compare the efficacy of telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment.
A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing telepsychiatry with face-to-face treatment for psychiatric disorders. The primary outcome was the mean change in the standard symptom scale scores used for each psychiatric disorder. Secondary outcomes included all meta-analysable outcomes, such as all-cause discontinuation and safety/tolerability.
We identified 32 studies (
= 3592 participants) across 11 mental illnesses. Disease-specific analyses showed that telepsychiatry was superior to face-to-face treatment regarding symptom improvement for depressive disorders (
= 6 studies,
= 561; standardised mean difference s.m.d. = -0.325, 95% CI -0.640 to -0.011,
= 0.043), whereas face-to-face treatment was superior to telepsychiatry for eating disorder (
= 1,
= 128; s.m.d. = 0.368, 95% CI 0.018-0.717,
= 0.039). No significant difference was seen between telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment when all the studies/diagnoses were combined (
= 26,
= 2290;
= 0.248). Telepsychiatry had significantly fewer all-cause discontinuations than face-to-face treatment for mild cognitive impairment (
= 1,
= 61; risk ratio RR = 0.552, 95% CI 0.312-0.975,
= 0.040), whereas the opposite was seen for substance misuse (
= 1,
= 85; RR = 37.41, 95% CI 2.356-594.1,
= 0.010). No significant difference regarding all-cause discontinuation was seen between telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment when all the studies/diagnoses were combined (
= 27,
= 3341;
= 0.564).
Telepsychiatry achieved a symptom improvement effect for various psychiatric disorders similar to that of face-to-face treatment. However, some superiorities/inferiorities were seen across a few specific psychiatric disorders, suggesting that its efficacy may vary according to disease type. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
DOI: | 10.1192/bjp.2023.86 |