Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study

Abstract Introduction Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2024-02, Vol.53 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Moloney, Elizabeth, O’Donovan, Mark R, Carpenter, Christopher R, Salvi, Fabio, Dent, Elsa, Mooijaart, Simon, Hoogendijk, Emiel O, Woo, Jean, Morley, John, Hubbard, Ruth E, Cesari, Matteo, Ahern, Emer, Romero-Ortuno, Roman, Mcnamara, Rosa, O’Keefe, Anne, Healy, Ann, Heeren, Pieter, Mcloughlin, Darren, Deasy, Conor, Martin, Louise, Brousseau, Audrey Anne, Sezgin, Duygu, Bernard, Paul, Mcloughlin, Kara, Sri-On, Jiraporn, Melady, Don, Edge, Lucinda, O’Shaughnessy, Ide, Van Damme, Jill, Cardona, Magnolia, Kirby, Jennifer, Southerland, Lauren, Costa, Andrew, Sinclair, Douglas, Maxwell, Cathy, Doyle, Marie, Lewis, Ebony, Corcoran, Grace, Eagles, Debra, Dockery, Frances, Conroy, Simon, Timmons, Suzanne, O’Caoimh, Rónán
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. Methods A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August–September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. Results In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (
ISSN:0002-0729
1468-2834
1468-2834
DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae013