Virtual monoenergetic imaging in photon-counting CT of the head and neck

Advantages of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) have been reported for dual energy CT of the head and neck, and more recently VMIs derived from photon-counting (PCCT) angiography of the head and neck. We report image quality metrics of VMI in a PCCT angiography dataset, expanding the anatomical reg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical imaging 2023-10, Vol.102, p.109-115
Hauptverfasser: Farhadi, Faraz, Sahbaee, Pooyan, Rajagopal, Jayasai R., Nikpanah, Moozhan, Saboury, Babak, Gutjahr, Ralf, Biassou, Nadia M., Shah, Ritu, Flohr, Thomas G., Samei, Ehsan, Pritchard, William F., Malayeri, Ashkan A., Bluemke, David A., Jones, Elizabeth C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Advantages of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) have been reported for dual energy CT of the head and neck, and more recently VMIs derived from photon-counting (PCCT) angiography of the head and neck. We report image quality metrics of VMI in a PCCT angiography dataset, expanding the anatomical regions evaluated and extending observer-based qualitative methods further than previously reported. In a prospective study, asymptomatic subjects underwent contrast enhanced PCCT of the head and neck using an investigational scanner. Image sets of low, high, and full spectrum (Threshold-1) energies; linear mix of low and high energies (Mix); and 23 VMIs (40–150 keV, 5 keV increments) were generated. In 8 anatomical locations, SNR and radiologists' preferences for VMI energy levels were measured using a forced-choice rank method (4 observers) and ratings of image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis (2 observers) comparing VMI to Mix and Threshold-1 images. Fifteen subjects were included (7 men, 8 women, mean 57 years, range 46–75). Among all VMIs, SNRs varied by anatomic location. The highest SNRs were observed in VMIs. Radiologists preferred 50–60 keV VMIs for vascular structures and 75–85 keV for all other structures. Cumulative ratings of image quality averaged across all locations were higher for VMIs with areas under the curve of VMI vs Mix and VMI vs Threshold-1 of 0.67 and 0.68 for the first reader and 0.72 and 0.76 for the second, respectively. Preferred keV level and quality ratings of VMI compared to mixed and Threshold-1 images varied by anatomical location. •Peak SNR was between VMI energies of 45–75 keV for all anatomic locations representing diagnostic imaging tasks.•Radiologists preferred VMI of 50–60 keV for vascular tasks and 75–85 keV for CSF and low contrast soft tissue tasks in brain.•Both readers preferred virtual monoenergetic images over a linear mix of low and high energies and full spectrum images.
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.08.004