Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta‐analysis
We examined whether small incision aortic root replacement could reduce the amount of blood transfusion during operation and the risk of postoperative complications. An extensive e‐review of the 4 main databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE) was carried out to determine all the publi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International wound journal 2024-02, Vol.21 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We examined whether small incision aortic root replacement could reduce the amount of blood transfusion during operation and the risk of postoperative complications. An extensive e‐review of the 4 main databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE) was carried out to determine all the published trials by July 2023. The search terms used were associated with partial versus full sternotomy and aortic root. This analysis only included the study articles that compared partial and full sternotomy. After excluding articles based on titles or s, selected full‐text articles had reference lists searched for any potential further articles. We analysed a total of 2167 subjects from 10 comparable trials. The minimally invasive aortic root graft in breastbone decreased the duration of hospitalization (MD, −2.58; 95% CI, −3.15, −2.01, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1742-4801 1742-481X 1742-481X |
DOI: | 10.1111/iwj.14396 |