Quantitative Nontarget Analysis of CECs in Environmental Samples Can Be Improved by Considering All Mass Adducts

Quantitative nontarget analysis (qNTA) for liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry enables a more comprehensive assessment of environmental samples. Previous studies have shown that correlations between a compound’s ionization efficiency and a range of molecular descriptor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2024-01, Vol.96 (1), p.229-237
Hauptverfasser: Tisler, Selina, Kilpinen, Kristoffer, Pattison, David I., Tomasi, Giorgio, Christensen, Jan H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Quantitative nontarget analysis (qNTA) for liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry enables a more comprehensive assessment of environmental samples. Previous studies have shown that correlations between a compound’s ionization efficiency and a range of molecular descriptors can predict the compound’s concentration within a factor of 5. In this study, the qNTA approach was further improved by considering all mass adducts instead of only the protonated ion. The model was based on a quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR), including 216 contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), of which 80 exhibited adduct formation that accounted for >10% of the total peak intensity. When all mass adducts were included, the test set coefficient of determination improved to Q 2 = 0.855 compared to Q 2 = 0.670 when only the protonated ions were considered (test set median RF error factor 1.6). The inclusion of all adducts was also important to transfer the RF QSPR model reliably. It was assumed that RF variations are sequence-dependent; therefore, a second QSPR model for the prediction of the transferability factor was built for each sequence. For validation, samples were analyzed up to two years apart. The median prediction fold change was 1.74 for analytical standards (63 compounds) and 2.4 for enriched wastewater effluent samples (41 compounds), with 80% of the compounds predicted within a fold change of 2.4 and 3.3, respectively. The model was also validated on a second instrument, where 80% of the 26 compounds in wastewater effluent were predicted within a factor of 3.8.
ISSN:0003-2700
1520-6882
DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03791