Hand function and quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

This study aimed to investigate the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with diabetes mellitus using patient-rated outcome measures focusing on hand function and quality of life, as well as patients' mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nagoya journal of medical science 2023-11, Vol.85 (4), p.659-667
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Michiro, Kato, Yayoi, Takeuchi, Jun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to investigate the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with diabetes mellitus using patient-rated outcome measures focusing on hand function and quality of life, as well as patients' mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. It was a part of a longitudinal research involving patients with diabetes mellitus living in Sapporo, Japan. Among the 594 patients surveyed before the COVID-19 pandemic from March to June 2019, 417 patients who could be re-surveyed from March to June 2021 were included. We compared the patient-rated outcome measures, namely the Hand10 for hand function and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire for assessing quality of life in the same population of patients with diabetes mellitus, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicated no deterioration in the Hand10 (3.9 vs 3.6) and quality of life scores (0.89 vs 0.9), including mobility (1.25 vs 1.17), self-care (1.1 vs 1.08), pain/discomfort (1.43 vs 1.35), and anxiety/depression (1.21 vs 1.2), during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with the pre-pandemic values. Usual activity values on the EuroQol five-dimension subscale significantly improved during the pandemic compared to those before the pandemic (1.21 vs 1.12, p
ISSN:0027-7622
2186-3326
DOI:10.18999/nagjms.85.4.659