Recurrent Cryptococcal Meningitis in a Late Presenter of HIV: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature
BACKGROUND The highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) and the primary prophylaxis in newly diagnosed people living with HIV (PLHIV) have reduced the incidence of opportunistic infections such as cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Relapse of CM is associated with increased morbidity and mortality....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of case reports 2023-12, Vol.24, p.e941714-e941714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND The highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) and the primary prophylaxis in newly diagnosed people living with HIV (PLHIV) have reduced the incidence of opportunistic infections such as cryptococcal meningitis (CM). Relapse of CM is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present case presentation is to report the clinical progress relapse of CM in a man who was a late presenter PLHIV, 1 year after ART initiation with increased CD4 cell count, undetectable viral load, and excellent compliance after disruption of secondary antifungal prophylaxis. CASE REPORT One year after initial diagnosis of HIV and CM, the patient had no neurological or other symptoms, and viral suppression and increased CD4 cell count were achieved. After the completion of 12 months of secondary prophylaxis with fluconazole, an episode of partial seizure with secondary generalization occurred, followed by a short-term memory loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated a focal lesion in right frontal-parietal brain region. Lumbar puncture was conducted and Cryptococcus neoformans non-resistant to fluconazole was isolated. He received antiepileptic treatment, induction antifungal treatment with liposomal amphotericin and fluconazole, consolidation treatment with fluconazole, and secondary prophylaxis with fluconazole, as in the first episode of CM. One year after the relapse, antiepileptic treatment and secondary prophylaxis with fluconazole continues and no new episode has been reported. The diagnosis of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)-related relapse of CM cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS Further studies are needed for the evaluation of parameters such as duration of secondary prophylaxis and treatment options for induction and consolidation therapy to reduce the relapse rate of CM. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-5923 1941-5923 |
DOI: | 10.12659/AJCR.941714 |