Expert Consensus on SABA Use for Asthma Clinical Decision-Making: A Delphi Approach

Purpose of Review A modified Delphi process was undertaken to provide a US expert-led consensus to guide clinical action on short-acting beta 2 -agonist (SABA) use. This comprised an online survey (Phase 1), forum discussion and statement development (Phase 2), and statement adjudication (Phase 3)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current allergy and asthma reports 2023-11, Vol.23 (11), p.621-634
Hauptverfasser: Lugogo, Njira, O’Connor, Maeve, George, Maureen, Merchant, Rajan, Bensch, Greg, Portnoy, Jay, Oppenheimer, John, Castro, Mario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose of Review A modified Delphi process was undertaken to provide a US expert-led consensus to guide clinical action on short-acting beta 2 -agonist (SABA) use. This comprised an online survey (Phase 1), forum discussion and statement development (Phase 2), and statement adjudication (Phase 3). Recent Findings In Phase 1 ( n = 100 clinicians), 12% routinely provided patients with ≥4 SABA prescriptions/year, 73% solicited SABA use frequency at every patient visit, and 21% did not consult asthma guidelines/expert reports. Phase 3 experts ( n = 8) reached consensus (median Likert score, interquartile range) that use of ≥3 SABA canisters/year is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and asthma-related death (5, 4.75–5); SABA use history should be solicited at every patient visit (5, 4.75–5); usage patterns over time, not absolute thresholds, should guide response to SABA overuse (5, 4.5–5). Summary Future asthma guidelines should include clear recommendations regarding SABA usage, using expert-led thresholds for action.
ISSN:1529-7322
1534-6315
DOI:10.1007/s11882-023-01111-z