Expert Consensus on SABA Use for Asthma Clinical Decision-Making: A Delphi Approach
Purpose of Review A modified Delphi process was undertaken to provide a US expert-led consensus to guide clinical action on short-acting beta 2 -agonist (SABA) use. This comprised an online survey (Phase 1), forum discussion and statement development (Phase 2), and statement adjudication (Phase 3)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current allergy and asthma reports 2023-11, Vol.23 (11), p.621-634 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose of Review
A modified Delphi process was undertaken to provide a US expert-led consensus to guide clinical action on short-acting beta
2
-agonist (SABA) use. This comprised an online survey (Phase 1), forum discussion and statement development (Phase 2), and statement adjudication (Phase 3).
Recent Findings
In Phase 1 (
n
= 100 clinicians), 12% routinely provided patients with ≥4 SABA prescriptions/year, 73% solicited SABA use frequency at every patient visit, and 21% did not consult asthma guidelines/expert reports. Phase 3 experts (
n
= 8) reached consensus (median Likert score, interquartile range) that use of ≥3 SABA canisters/year is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and asthma-related death (5, 4.75–5); SABA use history should be solicited at every patient visit (5, 4.75–5); usage patterns over time, not absolute thresholds, should guide response to SABA overuse (5, 4.5–5).
Summary
Future asthma guidelines should include clear recommendations regarding SABA usage, using expert-led thresholds for action. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1529-7322 1534-6315 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11882-023-01111-z |