A Comparison of Treatment Effect Sizes in Matched Phase 2 and Phase 3 Trials of Advanced Therapeutics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Phase 2 trials are fundamental to the rational and efficient design of phase 3 trials. We aimed to determine the relationship of treatment effect size estimates from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials on advanced therapeutics in inflammatory bowel disease. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and translational gastroenterology 2023-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e00629-e00629
Hauptverfasser: Hanzel, Jurij, Solitano, Virginia, Zou, Lily, Zou, G Y, Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent, Danese, Silvio, Singh, Siddharth, Ma, Christopher, Wils, Pauline, Jairath, Vipul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Phase 2 trials are fundamental to the rational and efficient design of phase 3 trials. We aimed to determine the relationship of treatment effect size estimates from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials on advanced therapeutics in inflammatory bowel disease. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to December 19, 2022, to identify paired phase 2 and 3 placebo-controlled induction studies of advanced therapeutics for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Treatment effect sizes were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) between the active arm and placebo arm. For the same therapeutics, RRs from phase 2 trials were divided by the RR from phase 3 trial to quantify the relationship of effect sizes between phases. Twenty-two studies (9 phase 2 trials, 13 phase 3 trials) were included for CD and 30 studies (12 phase 2 trials, 18 phase 3 trials) for UC. In UC (pooled RR 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.86; RR
ISSN:2155-384X
2155-384X
DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000629