Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder: CT Findings and Radiomics Signature

Background: We present a case series of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder (NECB) to analyse their radiologic appearance on CT, find a “Radiomic signature”, and review the current literature. Methods: 14 CT cases of NECB were reviewed and compared with a control group of 42 patients wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2023-10, Vol.12 (20), p.6510
Hauptverfasser: Coppola, Andrea, Gatta, Tonia, Pini, Giacomo Maria, Scordi, Giorgia, Fontana, Federico, Piacentino, Filippo, Minici, Roberto, Laganà, Domenico, Basile, Antonio, Dehò, Federico, Carcano, Giulio, Franzi, Francesca, Uccella, Silvia, Sessa, Fausto, Venturini, Massimo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: We present a case series of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder (NECB) to analyse their radiologic appearance on CT, find a “Radiomic signature”, and review the current literature. Methods: 14 CT cases of NECB were reviewed and compared with a control group of 42 patients with high-grade non-neuroendocrine bladder neoplasm for the following parameters: ring enhancement; implantation site; dimensions; density; margins; central necrosis; calcifications; number of lesions; wall thickness; depth of invasion in the soft tissue; invasion of fat tissue; invasion of adjacent organs; lymph-node involvement; abdominal organ metastasis. To extract radiomic features, volumes of interest of bladder lesions were manually delineated on the portal-venous phase. The radiomic features of the two groups were identified and compared. Results: Statistical differences among NECB and control group were found in the prevalence of male sex (100% vs. 69.0%), hydronephrosis (71.4% vs. 33.3%), mean density of the mass (51.01 ± 15.48 vs. 76.27 ± 22.26 HU); product of the maximum diameters on the axial plane (38.1 ± 59.3 vs. 14.44 ± 12.98 cm2) in the control group, trigonal region involvement (78.57% vs. 19.05%). About the radiomic features, Student’s t-test showed significant correlation for the variables: “DependenceNonUniformity” (p: 0.048), “JointAverage” (p: 0.013), “LargeAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis” (p: 0.014), “Maximum2DDiameterColumn” (p: 0.04), “Maximum 2DDiameterSlice” (p: 0.007), “MeanAbsoluteDeviation” (p: 0.021), “BoundingBoxA” (p: 0.022) and “CenterOfMassB” (p: 0.007). Conclusions: There is a typical pattern (male patient, large mass, trigonal area involvement) of NECB presentation on contrast-enhanced CT. Certain morphological characteristics and encouraging results about Radiomic features can help define the diagnosis.
ISSN:2077-0383
2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm12206510