Atrial pacing minimization in sinus node dysfunction and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial

Abstract Background and Aims High percentages of atrial pacing have been associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. This study is aimed at evaluating whether atrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Methods In a n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2023-10, Vol.44 (40), p.4246-4255
Hauptverfasser: Kronborg, Mads Brix, Frausing, Maria Hee Jung Park, Malczynski, Jerzy, Riahi, Sam, Haarbo, Jens, Holm, Katja Fiedler, Larroudé, Charlotte Ellen, Albertsen, Andi Eie, Svendstrup, Lene, Hintze, Ulrik, Pedersen, Ole Dyg, Davidsen, Ulla, Fischer, Thomas, Johansen, Jens Brock, Kristensen, Jens, Gerdes, Christian, Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and Aims High percentages of atrial pacing have been associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. This study is aimed at evaluating whether atrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Methods In a nationwide, randomized controlled trial, 540 patients with sinus node dysfunction and an indication for first pacemaker implantation were assigned to pacing programmed to a base rate of 60 bpm and rate-adaptive pacing (DDDR-60) or pacing programmed to a base rate of 40 bpm without rate-adaptive pacing (DDD-40). Patients were followed on remote monitoring for 2 years. The primary endpoint was time to first episode of atrial fibrillation longer than 6 min. Secondary endpoints included longer episodes of atrial fibrillation, and the safety endpoint comprised a composite of syncope or presyncope. Results The median percentage of atrial pacing was 1% in patients assigned to DDD-40 and 49% in patients assigned to DDDR-60. The primary endpoint occurred in 124 patients (46%) in each treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–1.25, P = .83). There were no between-group differences in atrial fibrillation exceeding 6 or 24 h, persistent atrial fibrillation, or cardioversions for atrial fibrillation. The incidence of syncope or presyncope was higher in patients assigned to DDD-40 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.13–2.59, P = .01). Conclusions Atrial pacing minimization in patients with sinus node dysfunction does not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Programming a base rate of 40 bpm without rate-adaptive pacing is associated with an increased risk of syncope or presyncope. Structured Graphical Abstract Structured Graphical Abstract Consort diagram of the DANPACE II trial. Median percentage of atrial pacing in the two groups. Primary endpoint defined as time to first episode of atrial fibrillation > 6 min. Secondary and safety endpoints including syncope/presyncope, crossover, quality of life assessment, and 6 min walk test.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad564