Comparison of the effectiveness of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy alone in advanced biliary tract cancer and construction of the nomogram for survival prediction based on the inflammatory index and controlling nutritional status score

Objective To analyze the effectiveness of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) and explore the biomarkers affecting the prognosis of immunotherapy, to construct a nomogram for the prediction of survival. Methods A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Immunotherapy, 2023-11, Vol.72 (11), p.3635-3649
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Zhengfeng, Wang, Dazhen, Zhang, Jianji, Ruan, Yuli, Zhao, Lu, Yang, Liu, Liu, Ze, Yang, Lei, Lou, Changjie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To analyze the effectiveness of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) and explore the biomarkers affecting the prognosis of immunotherapy, to construct a nomogram for the prediction of survival. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to include a total of 209 patients with advanced BTC treated in the first line from 2018 to 2022, divided into a combination therapy group ( n  = 129) and a chemotherapy-only group ( n  = 80) according to whether ICIs were applied in combination. Univariate and multifactorial COX regression analyses were performed on variables that may affect prognosis to identify independent influences on patient prognosis, and this was used to create nomograms, which were then prospectively validated and calibrated. Results The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) of patients in the combination therapy group were higher than those in the chemotherapy alone group [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.152, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7848–1.692, p  = 0.0004, and HR = 1.067, 95% CI: 0.7474–1.524, p  = 0.0016]. The objective response rate (ORR) of patients in the combination therapy and chemotherapy alone groups was 39.5% (51/129) vs. 27.5% (22/80), and the disease control rate (DCR) between the two groups was 89.9% (116/129) vs. 83.8% (67/80). Univariate analysis revealed the gender, presence of long-term tobacco and alcohol, degree of histological differentiation, serum albumin level, presence of liver metastases, presence of multi-visceral metastases, response, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), glycoprotein antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), systemic inflammatory index (SII), and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores were statistically significant with patient prognosis (all P values 
ISSN:0340-7004
1432-0851
DOI:10.1007/s00262-023-03513-4