Improving the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics simulations of coiled cerebral aneurysms using finite element modeling
Cerebral aneurysms are a serious clinical challenge, with ∼half resulting in death or disability. Treatment via endovascular coiling significantly reduces the chances of rupture, but the techniquehas failure rates of ∼20 %. This presents a pressing need to develop a method fordetermining optimal coi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2023-08, Vol.157, p.111733-111733, Article 111733 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cerebral aneurysms are a serious clinical challenge, with ∼half resulting in death or disability. Treatment via endovascular coiling significantly reduces the chances of rupture, but the techniquehas failure rates of ∼20 %. This presents a pressing need to develop a method fordetermining optimal coildeploymentstrategies. Quantification of the hemodynamics of coiled aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has the potential to predict post-treatment outcomes, but representing the coil mass in CFD simulations remains a challenge. We use the Finite Element Method (FEM) for simulating patient-specific coil deployment for n = 4 ICA aneurysms for which 3D printed in vitro models were also generated, coiled, and scanned using ultra-high resolution synchrotron micro-CT. The physical and virtual coil geometries were voxelized onto a binary structured grid and porosity maps were generated for geometric comparison. The average binary accuracy score is 0.8623 and the average error in porosity map is 4.94 %. We then conduct patient-specific CFD simulations of the aneurysm hemodynamics using virtual coils geometries, micro-CT generated oil geometries, and using the porous medium method to represent the coil mass. Hemodynamic parameters including Neck Inflow Rate (Qneck) and Wall Shear Stress (WSS) were calculated for each of the CFD simulations. The average relative error in Qneck and WSS from CFD using FEM geometry were 6.6 % and 21.8 % respectively, while the error from CFD using a porous media approximation resulted in errors of 55.1 % and 36.3 % respectively; demonstrating a marked improvement in the accuracy of CFD simulations using FEM generated coil geometries. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9290 1873-2380 1873-2380 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111733 |