Comparison of diabetic retinopathy severity grading on ETDRS 7-field versus ultrawide-field assessment

Objectives To compare the diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity level determined when considering only the ETDRS 7-field region versus the entire ultrawidefield (UWF) image. Methods In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, UWF pseudocolor images were graded on the Eyenuk image viewing, grading, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2023-10, Vol.37 (14), p.2946-2949
Hauptverfasser: Attiku, Yamini, Nittala, Muneeswar Gupta, Velaga, Swetha B., Ramachandra, Chaithanya, Bhat, Sandeep, Solanki, Kaushal, Jayadev, Chaitra, Choudhry, Netan, Orr, Samantha Miyoko Ashlyn, Jiang, Shangjun, He, Ye, Sadda, SriniVas R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To compare the diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity level determined when considering only the ETDRS 7-field region versus the entire ultrawidefield (UWF) image. Methods In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, UWF pseudocolor images were graded on the Eyenuk image viewing, grading, and annotation platform for the severity of DR considering only the regions within the ETDRS 7-fields as well as the entire UWF image using two different protocols: 1) the simple International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) scale and 2) the more complex DRCR.net Protocol AA grading scale. Results A total of 250 eyes from 157 patients were included in this analysis. Six eyes (2.4%) demonstrated a discrepancy in severity level between the ETDRS 7-field region and the entire UWF image when using the ICDR classification system. The discrepancies were due to the presence of lesions [intraretinal haemorrhage ( n  = 2), neovascular disease ( n  = 4)] in the peripheral fields which were not identified in the ETDRS 7-fields. Fourteen eyes (5.6%) had a discrepancy in severity level between the ETDRS 7-field region and the entire UWF image when using the ETDRS DRSS Protocol AA grading scale. The discrepancies were due to the presence of a higher level of disease [intraretinal haemorrhage ( n  = 4), neovascularization ( n  = 4), preretinal haemorrhage ( n  = 2), scatter laser scars ( n  = 4)] in the peripheral fields. Conclusion Although considering regions outside of the ETDRS 7-fields altered the DR severity level assessment in
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/s41433-023-02445-8