A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Screening Chest Radiographs in a Pediatric ICU

The Critical Care Societies Collaborative included not ordering diagnostic tests at regular intervals as one of their Choosing Wisely initiatives. A reduction in unnecessary chest radiographs (CXRs) can help reduce exposure to radiation and eliminate health care waste. We aimed to reduce daily scree...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1377-1384
Hauptverfasser: Malin, Stefan W, Maue, Danielle K, Cater, Daniel T, Ealy, Aimee R, McCallister, Anne E, Valentine, Kevin M, Abu-Sultaneh, Samer M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Critical Care Societies Collaborative included not ordering diagnostic tests at regular intervals as one of their Choosing Wisely initiatives. A reduction in unnecessary chest radiographs (CXRs) can help reduce exposure to radiation and eliminate health care waste. We aimed to reduce daily screening CXRs in a pediatric ICU (PICU) by 20% from baseline within 4 months of implementation of CXR criteria. All intubated patients in the PICU were included in this quality improvement project. Patients with tracheostomies were excluded. We developed criteria delineating which patients were most likely to benefit from a daily screening CXR, and these criteria were discussed for each patient on rounds. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, or on high support on conventional mechanical ventilation were included as needing a daily screening CXR. We tracked the percentage of intubated subjects receiving a screening CXR as an outcome measure. Unplanned extubations and the number of non-screening CXRs per intubated subject were followed as balancing measures. The percentage of intubated subjects receiving a daily screening CXR was reduced from 79% to 31%. There was no increase in frequency of unplanned extubations or number of non-screening CXRs. With an estimated subject charge of roughly $270 and hospital cost of $54 per CXR, this project led to an estimated $300,000 in patient charge savings and $60,000 in hospital cost savings. Adopting criteria to delineate which patients are most likely to benefit from screening CXRs can lead to a reduction in the percentage of intubated patients receiving screening CXRs without appearing to increase harm.
ISSN:0020-1324
1943-3654
1943-3654
DOI:10.4187/respcare.10689