Contemporary patterns of local ablative therapies for prostate cancer at United States cancer centers: results from a national registry

Purpose To describe the national-level patterns of care for local ablative therapy among men with PCa and identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with the receipt of these techniques. Methods We retrospectively interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for men with clinically...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2023-05, Vol.41 (5), p.1309-1315
Hauptverfasser: Koelker, Mara, Labban, Muhieddine, Frego, Nicola, Meyer, Christian P., Salomon, Georg, Lipsitz, Stuart R., Withington, John, Moore, Caroline M., Tempany, Clare M., Tuncali, Kemal, George, Arvin, Kibel, Adam S., Trinh, Quoc-Dien, Cole, Alexander P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To describe the national-level patterns of care for local ablative therapy among men with PCa and identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with the receipt of these techniques. Methods We retrospectively interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for men with clinically localized PCa between 2010 and 2017. The main outcome was receipt of local tumor ablation with either cryo- or laser-ablation, and “other method of local tumor destruction including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)”. Patient level, hospital level, and demographic variables were collected. Mixed effect logistic regression models were fitted to identify separately patient- and hospital-level predictors of receipt of local ablative therapy. Results Overall, 11,278 patients received ablative therapy, of whom 78.8% had cryotherapy, 15.6% had laser, and 5.7% had another method including HIFU. At the patient level, men with intermediate-risk PCa were more likely to be treated with local ablative therapy (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00–1.11; p  = 0.05), as were men with Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1 (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29–1.43; p  
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04354-7