Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss

Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2023-08, Vol.24 (4), p.429-439
Hauptverfasser: Molis, Michelle R., Bologna, William J., Madsen, Brandon M., Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar, Billings, Curtis J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 4
container_start_page 429
container_title Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
container_volume 24
creator Molis, Michelle R.
Bologna, William J.
Madsen, Brandon M.
Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar
Billings, Curtis J.
description Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data obtained from older adults—with normal or impaired hearing—were compared with previous results obtained from normal-hearing younger adults to evaluate the effects of age and hearing loss on the fidelity of FFRs to tone glides. Method A signal detection approach was used to model a threshold criterion to distinguish the FFR from baseline neural activity. The response strength and temporal coherence of the FFR to tone glides varying in direction (rising or falling) and extent ( 1 3 , 2 3 , or 1 octave) were assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and stimulus–response correlation coefficient (SRCC) in older adults with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Results Significant group mean differences in both SNR and SRCC were noted—with poorer responses more frequently observed with increased age and hearing loss—but with considerable response variability among individuals within each group and substantial overlap among group distributions. Conclusion The overall distribution of FFRs across listeners and stimulus conditions suggests that observed group differences associated with age and hearing loss are influenced by a decreased likelihood of older and hearing-impaired individuals having a detectable FFR response and by lower average FFR fidelity among those older and hearing-impaired individuals who do have a detectable response.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10162-023-00900-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10504227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836874274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d507e2346cc30b620aa8a2711b26545020eb31d9c234e8a017e324166b54eccf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctOHDEQtKIgHht-IIfIUi65DGm_Z3OJEGIBaVGkiJwtj6dnM2jW3tizRPw9HhYIySEnt9RV5aouQt4zOGEA5nNmwDSvgIsKYA5QmTfkkElRV0YZ8fbVfECOcr4FYEbp-T45EKZslOGH5HqR8NcWg7-nizgM8XcfVvQ75k0MGTMdI72JAenF0LeYv9DzrkM_Zho7erpC6kJLL9GlibSMOb8je50bMh4_vTPyY3F-c3ZZLb9dXJ2dLisvjRqrVoFBLqT2XkCjOThXO24Ya7hWUgEHbARr575gsHbFNgoumdaNkuh9J2bk6053s23W2HoMY3KD3aR-7dK9ja63f29C_9Ou4p1loEByborCpyeFFEv-PNp1nz0OgwsYt9nyWujaSF4ONSMf_4Hexm0KJV9BaVWcgZwE-Q7lUzlEwu7FDQM71WV3ddlSl32sy06kD69zvFCe-ykAsQPkzXRkTH_-_o_sA_vZnqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865324047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Molis, Michelle R. ; Bologna, William J. ; Madsen, Brandon M. ; Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar ; Billings, Curtis J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Molis, Michelle R. ; Bologna, William J. ; Madsen, Brandon M. ; Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar ; Billings, Curtis J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data obtained from older adults—with normal or impaired hearing—were compared with previous results obtained from normal-hearing younger adults to evaluate the effects of age and hearing loss on the fidelity of FFRs to tone glides. Method A signal detection approach was used to model a threshold criterion to distinguish the FFR from baseline neural activity. The response strength and temporal coherence of the FFR to tone glides varying in direction (rising or falling) and extent ( 1 3 , 2 3 , or 1 octave) were assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and stimulus–response correlation coefficient (SRCC) in older adults with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Results Significant group mean differences in both SNR and SRCC were noted—with poorer responses more frequently observed with increased age and hearing loss—but with considerable response variability among individuals within each group and substantial overlap among group distributions. Conclusion The overall distribution of FFRs across listeners and stimulus conditions suggests that observed group differences associated with age and hearing loss are influenced by a decreased likelihood of older and hearing-impaired individuals having a detectable FFR response and by lower average FFR fidelity among those older and hearing-impaired individuals who do have a detectable response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-7573</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-7573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10162-023-00900-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37438572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Age ; Aged ; Auditory nerve ; Brain stem ; Cortex (auditory) ; Cortex (temporal) ; Deafness ; Hearing - physiology ; Hearing Loss ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurobiology ; Neurosciences ; Older people ; Original : General Research ; Original Article: General Research ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Speech Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2023-08, Vol.24 (4), p.429-439</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023</rights><rights>2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d507e2346cc30b620aa8a2711b26545020eb31d9c234e8a017e324166b54eccf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d507e2346cc30b620aa8a2711b26545020eb31d9c234e8a017e324166b54eccf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3873-7847</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504227/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504227/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molis, Michelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bologna, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Brandon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billings, Curtis J.</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss</title><title>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</title><addtitle>JARO</addtitle><addtitle>J Assoc Res Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data obtained from older adults—with normal or impaired hearing—were compared with previous results obtained from normal-hearing younger adults to evaluate the effects of age and hearing loss on the fidelity of FFRs to tone glides. Method A signal detection approach was used to model a threshold criterion to distinguish the FFR from baseline neural activity. The response strength and temporal coherence of the FFR to tone glides varying in direction (rising or falling) and extent ( 1 3 , 2 3 , or 1 octave) were assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and stimulus–response correlation coefficient (SRCC) in older adults with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Results Significant group mean differences in both SNR and SRCC were noted—with poorer responses more frequently observed with increased age and hearing loss—but with considerable response variability among individuals within each group and substantial overlap among group distributions. Conclusion The overall distribution of FFRs across listeners and stimulus conditions suggests that observed group differences associated with age and hearing loss are influenced by a decreased likelihood of older and hearing-impaired individuals having a detectable FFR response and by lower average FFR fidelity among those older and hearing-impaired individuals who do have a detectable response.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Auditory nerve</subject><subject>Brain stem</subject><subject>Cortex (auditory)</subject><subject>Cortex (temporal)</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original : General Research</subject><subject>Original Article: General Research</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1438-7573</issn><issn>1525-3961</issn><issn>1438-7573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctOHDEQtKIgHht-IIfIUi65DGm_Z3OJEGIBaVGkiJwtj6dnM2jW3tizRPw9HhYIySEnt9RV5aouQt4zOGEA5nNmwDSvgIsKYA5QmTfkkElRV0YZ8fbVfECOcr4FYEbp-T45EKZslOGH5HqR8NcWg7-nizgM8XcfVvQ75k0MGTMdI72JAenF0LeYv9DzrkM_Zho7erpC6kJLL9GlibSMOb8je50bMh4_vTPyY3F-c3ZZLb9dXJ2dLisvjRqrVoFBLqT2XkCjOThXO24Ya7hWUgEHbARr575gsHbFNgoumdaNkuh9J2bk6053s23W2HoMY3KD3aR-7dK9ja63f29C_9Ou4p1loEByborCpyeFFEv-PNp1nz0OgwsYt9nyWujaSF4ONSMf_4Hexm0KJV9BaVWcgZwE-Q7lUzlEwu7FDQM71WV3ddlSl32sy06kD69zvFCe-ykAsQPkzXRkTH_-_o_sA_vZnqw</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Molis, Michelle R.</creator><creator>Bologna, William J.</creator><creator>Madsen, Brandon M.</creator><creator>Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar</creator><creator>Billings, Curtis J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-7847</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss</title><author>Molis, Michelle R. ; Bologna, William J. ; Madsen, Brandon M. ; Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar ; Billings, Curtis J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d507e2346cc30b620aa8a2711b26545020eb31d9c234e8a017e324166b54eccf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Auditory nerve</topic><topic>Brain stem</topic><topic>Cortex (auditory)</topic><topic>Cortex (temporal)</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original : General Research</topic><topic>Original Article: General Research</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molis, Michelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bologna, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Brandon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billings, Curtis J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molis, Michelle R.</au><au>Bologna, William J.</au><au>Madsen, Brandon M.</au><au>Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar</au><au>Billings, Curtis J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology</jtitle><stitle>JARO</stitle><addtitle>J Assoc Res Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>429-439</pages><issn>1438-7573</issn><issn>1525-3961</issn><eissn>1438-7573</eissn><abstract>Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data obtained from older adults—with normal or impaired hearing—were compared with previous results obtained from normal-hearing younger adults to evaluate the effects of age and hearing loss on the fidelity of FFRs to tone glides. Method A signal detection approach was used to model a threshold criterion to distinguish the FFR from baseline neural activity. The response strength and temporal coherence of the FFR to tone glides varying in direction (rising or falling) and extent ( 1 3 , 2 3 , or 1 octave) were assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and stimulus–response correlation coefficient (SRCC) in older adults with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Results Significant group mean differences in both SNR and SRCC were noted—with poorer responses more frequently observed with increased age and hearing loss—but with considerable response variability among individuals within each group and substantial overlap among group distributions. Conclusion The overall distribution of FFRs across listeners and stimulus conditions suggests that observed group differences associated with age and hearing loss are influenced by a decreased likelihood of older and hearing-impaired individuals having a detectable FFR response and by lower average FFR fidelity among those older and hearing-impaired individuals who do have a detectable response.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37438572</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10162-023-00900-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-7847</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-7573
ispartof Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2023-08, Vol.24 (4), p.429-439
issn 1438-7573
1525-3961
1438-7573
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10504227
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Age
Aged
Auditory nerve
Brain stem
Cortex (auditory)
Cortex (temporal)
Deafness
Hearing - physiology
Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurobiology
Neurosciences
Older people
Original : General Research
Original Article: General Research
Otorhinolaryngology
Speech Perception - physiology
title Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T15%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20Following%20Responses%20to%20Tone%20Glides:%20Effects%20of%20Age%20and%20Hearing%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Association%20for%20Research%20in%20Otolaryngology&rft.au=Molis,%20Michelle%20R.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=429-439&rft.issn=1438-7573&rft.eissn=1438-7573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10162-023-00900-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2836874274%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865324047&rft_id=info:pmid/37438572&rfr_iscdi=true