Frequency Following Responses to Tone Glides: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss

Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2023-08, Vol.24 (4), p.429-439
Hauptverfasser: Molis, Michelle R., Bologna, William J., Madsen, Brandon M., Muralimanohar, Ramesh Kumar, Billings, Curtis J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Speech is characterized by dynamic acoustic cues that must be encoded by the auditory periphery, auditory nerve, and brainstem before they can be represented in the auditory cortex. The fidelity of these cues in the brainstem can be assessed with the frequency-following response (FFR). Data obtained from older adults—with normal or impaired hearing—were compared with previous results obtained from normal-hearing younger adults to evaluate the effects of age and hearing loss on the fidelity of FFRs to tone glides. Method A signal detection approach was used to model a threshold criterion to distinguish the FFR from baseline neural activity. The response strength and temporal coherence of the FFR to tone glides varying in direction (rising or falling) and extent ( 1 3 , 2 3 , or 1 octave) were assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and stimulus–response correlation coefficient (SRCC) in older adults with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Results Significant group mean differences in both SNR and SRCC were noted—with poorer responses more frequently observed with increased age and hearing loss—but with considerable response variability among individuals within each group and substantial overlap among group distributions. Conclusion The overall distribution of FFRs across listeners and stimulus conditions suggests that observed group differences associated with age and hearing loss are influenced by a decreased likelihood of older and hearing-impaired individuals having a detectable FFR response and by lower average FFR fidelity among those older and hearing-impaired individuals who do have a detectable response.
ISSN:1438-7573
1525-3961
1438-7573
DOI:10.1007/s10162-023-00900-7