Quality of Depression Care for Veterans Affairs Primary Care Patients with Experiences of Homelessness

Background Persons who experience homelessness (PEH) have high rates of depression and incur challenges accessing high-quality health care. Some Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities offer homeless-tailored primary care clinics, although such tailoring is not required, within or outside VA. Whether servi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2023-08, Vol.38 (11), p.2436-2444
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Audrey L., Chu, Karen, Rose, Danielle E., Gelberg, Lillian, Kertesz, Stefan G., Gordon, Adam J., Wells, Kenneth B., Leung, Lucinda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Persons who experience homelessness (PEH) have high rates of depression and incur challenges accessing high-quality health care. Some Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities offer homeless-tailored primary care clinics, although such tailoring is not required, within or outside VA. Whether services tailoring enhances care for depression is unstudied. Objective To determine whether PEH in homeless-tailored primary care settings receive higher quality of depression care, compared to PEH in usual VA primary care. Design Retrospective cohort study of depression treatment among a regional cohort of VA primary care patients (2016–2019). Participants PEH diagnosed or treated for a depressive disorder. Main Measures The quality measures were timely follow-up care (3 + completed visits with a primary care or mental health specialist provider, or 3 + psychotherapy sessions) within 84 days of a positive PHQ-2 screen result, timely follow-up care within 180 days, and minimally appropriate treatment (4 + mental health visits, 3 + psychotherapy visits, 60 + days antidepressant) within 365 days. We applied multivariable mixed-effect logistic regressions to model differences in care quality for PEH in homeless-tailored versus usual primary care settings. Key Results Thirteen percent of PEH with depressive disorders received homeless-tailored primary care ( n  = 374), compared to usual VA primary care ( n  = 2469). Tailored clinics served more PEH who were Black, who were non-married, and who had low income, serious mental illness, and substance use disorders. Among all PEH, 48% received timely follow-up care within 84 days of depression screening, 67% within 180 days, and 83% received minimally appropriate treatment. Quality metric attainment was higher for PEH in homeless-tailored clinics, compared to PEH in usual VA primary care: follow-up within 84 days (63% versus 46%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61, p  = .001), follow-up within 180 days (78% versus 66%; AOR = 1.51, p  = .003), and minimally appropriate treatment (89% versus 82%; AOR = 1.58, p  = .004). Conclusions Homeless-tailored primary care approaches may improve depression care for PEH.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-023-08077-8