Comparative analysis of clinical breakpoints, normalized resistance interpretation and epidemiological cut-offs in interpreting antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolates originating from poultry in different farm types in Tanzania

Introduction. Existing breakpoint guidelines are not optimal for interpreting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data from animal studies and low-income countries, and therefore their utility for analysing such data is limited. There is a need to integrate diverse data sets, such as those from low-incom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Access microbiology 2023-07, Vol.5 (7)
Hauptverfasser: Maganga, Ruth, Sindiyo, Emmanuel, Musyoki, Victor Moses, Shirima, Gabriel, Mmbaga, Blandina T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction. Existing breakpoint guidelines are not optimal for interpreting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data from animal studies and low-income countries, and therefore their utility for analysing such data is limited. There is a need to integrate diverse data sets, such as those from low-income populations and animals, to improve data interpretation. Gap statement. There is very limited research on the relative merits of clinical breakpoints, epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFFs) and normalized resistance interpretation (NRI) breakpoints in interpreting microbiological data, particularly in animal studies and studies from low-income countries. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates using ECOFFs, CLSI and NRI breakpoints. Methodology. A total of 59 non-repetitive poultry isolates were selected for investigation based on lactose fermentation on MacConkey agar and subsequent identification and confirmation as E. coli using chromogenic agar and uidA PCR. Kirby Bauer disc diffusion was used for susceptibility testing. For each antimicrobial agent, inhibition zone diameters were measured, and ECOFFs, CLSI and NRI bespoke breakpoints were used for resistance interpretation. Results. According to the interpretation of all breakpoints except ECOFFs, tetracycline resistance was significantly higher (TET) (67.8 –69.5 %), than those for ciprofloxacin (CIPRO) (18.6 –32.2 %), imipenem (IMI) (3.4 –35 %) and ceftazidime (CEF) (1.7 –45.8 %). Prevalence estimates of AMR using CLSI and NRI bespoke breakpoints did not differ for CEF (1.7 % CB and 1.7 % CO WT ), IMI (3.4 % CB and 4.0 % CO WT ) and TET (67.8 % CB and 69.5 % CO WT ). However, with ECOFFs, AMR estimates for CEF, IMI and CIP were significantly higher (45.8, 35.6 and 64.4 %, respectively; P
ISSN:2516-8290
2516-8290
DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000540.v4