Microvascular resistance reserve: diagnostic and prognostic performance in the ILIAS registry

Abstract Aims The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was introduced as a means to characterize the vasodilator reserve capacity of the coronary microcirculation while accounting for the influence of concomitant epicardial disease and the impact of administration of potent vasodilators on aortic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2023-08, Vol.44 (30), p.2862-2869
Hauptverfasser: Boerhout, Coen K M, Lee, Joo Myung, de Waard, Guus A, Mejia-Renteria, Hernan, Lee, Seung Hun, Jung, Ji-Hyun, Hoshino, Masahiro, Echavarria-Pinto, Mauro, Meuwissen, Martijn, Matsuo, Hitoshi, Madera-Cambero, Maribel, Eftekhari, Ashkan, Effat, Mohamed A, Murai, Tadashi, Marques, Koen, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Christiansen, Evald H, Banerjee, Rupak, Nam, Chang-Wook, Niccoli, Giampaolo, Nakayama, Masafumi, Tanaka, Nobuhiro, Shin, Eun-Seok, Appelman, Yolande, Beijk, Marcel A M, van Royen, Niels, Knaapen, Paul, Escaned, Javier, Kakuta, Tsunekazu, Koo, Bon Kwon, Piek, Jan J, van de Hoef, Tim P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was introduced as a means to characterize the vasodilator reserve capacity of the coronary microcirculation while accounting for the influence of concomitant epicardial disease and the impact of administration of potent vasodilators on aortic pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of MRR. Methods and results A total of 1481 patients with stable symptoms and a clinical indication for coronary angiography were included from the global ILIAS Registry. MRR was derived as a function of the coronary flow reserve (CFR) divided by the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and corrected for driving pressure. The median MRR was 2.97 [Q1–Q3: 2.32–3.86] and the overall relationship between MRR and CFR was good [correlation coefficient (Rs) = 0.88, P < 0.005]. The difference between CFR and MRR increased with decreasing FFR [coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.34; Coef.—2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.05–−2.73; P < 0.005]. MRR was independently associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% CI 0.63–0.95; P = 0.024] and with target vessel failure (TVF) at 5-year follow-up (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76–0.97; P = 0.047). The optimal cut-off value of MRR was 3.0. Based on this cut-off value, only abnormal MRR was significantly associated with MACE and TVF at 5-year follow-up in vessels with functionally significant epicardial disease (FFR
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad378