Delays in Follow-up after a Positive Lung Cancer Screening Exam: Is the Benefit of Screening Compromised?

Rivera et al discuss the study by Ahmed et al which evaluated delays in follow-up after a positive lung cancer screening (LCS) examination among 369 patients enrolled in a multisite LCS program in the Seattle area. Although the findings of delays in follow-up after positive low-dose computed tomogra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1102-1104
Hauptverfasser: Rivera, M Patricia, Henderson, Louise M, Sakoda, Lori C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rivera et al discuss the study by Ahmed et al which evaluated delays in follow-up after a positive lung cancer screening (LCS) examination among 369 patients enrolled in a multisite LCS program in the Seattle area. Although the findings of delays in follow-up after positive low-dose computed tomography findings are not new, the impact of delays in follow-up care after a positive LCS examination on lung cancer upstaging reported by Ahmed et al is novel and clinically meaningful. Delay before the first follow-up after a positive examination does not factor in additional delays or barriers to surgery or other treatment for lung cancer, which may further compromise the benefits of LCS.
ISSN:2329-6933
2325-6621
2325-6621
DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202305-440ED