Carotid artery intima media thickness can predict the response to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in patients with moderate erectile dysfunction

Increased carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) has been shown to be associated with erectile dysfunction (ED), but studies evaluating the efficacy of CIMT in predicting drug response are lacking in the literature. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CIMT in predicting the response to phosph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexual medicine 2023-06, Vol.11 (3), p.qfad042-qfad042
Hauptverfasser: Kilic, Metin, Caglayan, Volkan, Sambel, Murat, Erdogan, Abdullah, Onen, Efe, Kurtoglu, Unal, Erkan, Anıl, Avci, Sinan, Ekici, Ozgur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increased carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) has been shown to be associated with erectile dysfunction (ED), but studies evaluating the efficacy of CIMT in predicting drug response are lacking in the literature. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CIMT in predicting the response to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5-I). A total of 274 subjects were divided into two groups: ED patients (  = 150) and controls (  = 124). The patients in the ED group were further divided into the subgroups of severe, moderate, mild-moderate, and mild ED. Blood tests, carotid ultrasonography, and the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) diagnostic tool were applied to all subjects. Tadalafil was administered to each patient. The patients were re-evaluated using the IIEF-5 questionnaire after 2 months of treatment. According to their response to medication, the patients were evaluated as responders or nonresponders. Increased CIMT was significantly associated with the failure of PDE5-I therapy, especially in patients with moderate/mild-moderate ED. Fasting blood glucose, body mass index, and CIMT were significantly higher in the ED group compared to the control group (  .021,  = .006, and  
ISSN:2050-1161
2050-1161
DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfad042