Systematic symptom screening in patients with advanced cancer treated in certified oncology centers: results of the prospective multicenter German KeSBa project

Purpose Guidelines recommend a structured symptom screening (SC) for especially advanced cancer patients (CPs). The aim of this multicenter German prospective quality assurance project KeSBa (Kennzahl Symptom- und Belastungserfassung) was to gain knowledge on SC procedures in Oncology Centers (OCs)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2023-09, Vol.149 (11), p.8829-8842
Hauptverfasser: Braulke, Friederike, Para, Servet, Alt-Epping, Bernd, Tewes, Mitra, Bäumer, Markus, Haberland, Birgit, Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, Hopprich, Anne, de Wit, Maike, Grabe, Michaela, Bender-Säbelkampf, Sophia, Weßling, Caroline, Aulmann, Christoph, Gerlach, Christina, Regincos, Pascale, Fischer, Ferdinand, Haarmann, Soraya, Huys, Tatjana, Drygas, Sabine, Rambau, Anett, Kiani, Alexander, Schnabel, Astrid, Buhl, Christoph, Seipke, Stefanie, Hiemer, Sonja, Polata, Silke, Meßmann, Maximilian, Hansmeier, Anna, Anastasiadou, Louiza, Letsch, Anne, Wecht, Daniel, Hellberg-Naegele, Matthias, Krug, Utz, Wedding, Ulrich, van Oorschot, Birgitt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Guidelines recommend a structured symptom screening (SC) for especially advanced cancer patients (CPs). The aim of this multicenter German prospective quality assurance project KeSBa (Kennzahl Symptom- und Belastungserfassung) was to gain knowledge on SC procedures in Oncology Centers (OCs) for advanced cancer patients and a first impression on the consequences of SC. Methods The KeSBa project consisted of three phases: pilot, 3 months screening and feedback phase. Participating OCs decided to use either the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) or the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) and defined the cutoff values for positive screening results. Results Out of 172 certified German OCs, 40 (23%) participated in the KeSBa pilot phase, 29 (16.8%) in the 3 months screening phase using MIDOS ( n  = 18, 58.6%) or IPOS ( n  = 11, 41.3%) and in the feedback round. 25/29 performed paper-based screening (86.2%). 2.963 CPs were screened. Results were documented for 1255 (42.2%, SC +) positive and 874 (29.5%, SC–) negative screenings depending on the center´s schedules: 452 SC + CPs (28.4%) and 42 SC– CPs (2.6%) had contact to specialized palliative care or other supportive specialist teams afterwards, 458 SC + CPs (28.8%) and 605 SC– CPs (38.1%) remained in standard oncology care. In the feedback round missing resources (personal and IT) and improved communication were mentioned most often. Conclusion Routine SC is feasible in advanced CPs treated in OCs but associated with considerable workload. In 42.2% of CPs SC was classified as positive, indicating the need of further diagnostics or professional judgment. SC requires staff and IT resources.
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-023-04818-8