Syndromic Surveillance for COVID-19, Massachusetts, February 2020–November 2022: The Impact of Fever and Severity on Algorithm Performance

Objectives: Syndromic surveillance can help identify the onset, location, affected populations, and trends in infectious diseases quickly and efficiently. We developed an electronic medical record–based surveillance algorithm for COVID-19–like illness (CLI) and assessed its performance in 5 Massachu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health reports (1974) 2023-09, Vol.138 (5), p.756-762
Hauptverfasser: Cocoros, Noelle M., Willis, Sarah J., Eberhardt, Karen, Morrison, Monica, Randall, Liisa M., DeMaria, Alfred, Brown, Catherine M., Madoff, Lawrence C., Zambarano, Bob, Sljivo, Selsebil, Nagavedu, Kshema, Klompas, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: Syndromic surveillance can help identify the onset, location, affected populations, and trends in infectious diseases quickly and efficiently. We developed an electronic medical record–based surveillance algorithm for COVID-19–like illness (CLI) and assessed its performance in 5 Massachusetts medical practice groups compared with statewide counts of confirmed cases. Materials and Methods: Using data from February 2020 through November 2022, the CLI algorithm was implemented in sites that provide ambulatory and inpatient care for about 25% of the state. The initial algorithm for CLI was modeled on influenza-like illness: an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis code for COVID-19 and an ICD-10-CM diagnosis code suggesting severe lower respiratory tract infection or ≥1 ICD-10-CM diagnosis code for upper or lower respiratory tract infection plus fever. We generated weekly counts of CLI cases and patients with ≥1 clinical encounter and visually compared trends with those of statewide laboratory-confirmed cases. Results: The initial algorithm tracked well with the spring 2020 wave of COVID-19, but the components that required fever did not clearly detect the November 2020–January 2021 surge and identified
ISSN:0033-3549
1468-2877
DOI:10.1177/00333549231186574