Association of Primary Versus Rotating Nephrologist Model of Care in Hemodialysis Programs with Patient Outcomes

Nephrologist staffing models for patients receiving hemodialysis vary widely. Patients may be cared for continuously by a single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotating basis. It remains unclear whether these differing care models influence clinical outcomes. In this popula...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2023-07, Vol.34 (7), p.1155-1158
Hauptverfasser: Yau, Kevin, Jeyakumar, Nivethika, Kang, Yuguang, Dixon, Stephanie N, Freeman, Megan, Garg, Amit X, Harel, Ziv, Sood, Manish M, Thomas, Alison, Wald, Ron, Silver, Samuel A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nephrologist staffing models for patients receiving hemodialysis vary widely. Patients may be cared for continuously by a single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotating basis. It remains unclear whether these differing care models influence clinical outcomes. In this population-based cohort study of more than 14,000 incident patients on maintenance hemodialysis from Ontario, Canada, we found no difference in mortality, kidney transplantation, home dialysis initiation, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits when care was provided by a single primary nephrologist or a rotating group of nephrologists. These results suggest that primary nephrologist models do not necessarily improve objective clinical outcomes, providing reassurance to patients, providers, and administrators that both models are acceptable options.
ISSN:1046-6673
1533-3450
1533-3450
DOI:10.1681/ASN.0000000000000133