SARS-CoV-2 wildlife surveillance in Ontario and Québec

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, is capable of infecting a variety of wildlife species. Wildlife living in close contact with humans are at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and, if infected, have th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canada communicable disease report 2022-06, Vol.48 (6), p.243-251
Hauptverfasser: Greenhorn, Janet E, Kotwa, Jonathon D, Bowman, Jeff, Bruce, Laura, Buchanan, Tore, Buck, Peter A, Davy, Christina M, Dibernardo, Antonia, Flockhart, Logan, Gagnier, Marianne, Hou, Aaron, Jardine, Claire M, Lair, Stephane, Lindsay, L Robbin, Massé, Ariane, Muchaal, Pia K, Nituch, Larissa A, Sotto, Angelo, Stevens, Brian, Yip, Lily, Mubareka, Samira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, is capable of infecting a variety of wildlife species. Wildlife living in close contact with humans are at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and, if infected, have the potential to become a reservoir for the pathogen, making control and management more difficult. The objective of this study is to conduct SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in urban wildlife from Ontario and Québec, increasing our knowledge of the epidemiology of the virus and our chances of detecting spillover from humans into wildlife. Using a One Health approach, we leveraged activities of existing research, surveillance and rehabilitation programs among multiple agencies to collect samples from 776 animals from 17 different wildlife species between June 2020 and May 2021. Samples from all animals were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid, and a subset of samples from 219 animals across three species (raccoons, ; striped skunks, ; and mink, ) were also tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. No evidence of SARS-CoV-2 viral ribonucleic acid or neutralizing antibodies was detected in any of the tested samples. Although we were unable to identify positive SARS-CoV-2 cases in wildlife, continued research and surveillance activities are critical to better understand the rapidly changing landscape of susceptible animal species. Collaboration between academic, public and animal health sectors should include experts from relevant fields to build coordinated surveillance and response capacity.
ISSN:1188-4169
1481-8531
1481-8531
DOI:10.14745/ccdr.v48i06a02