Sensitivity of ICD coding for sepsis in children—a population-based study

Background International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease. Aim To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal 2023-01, Vol.1 (1), p.5-5, Article 5
Hauptverfasser: Endrich, Olga, Triep, Karen, Schlapbach, Luregn J., Posfay-Barbe, Klara M., Heininger, Ulrich, Giannoni, Eric, Stocker, Martin, Niederer-Loher, Anita, Kahlert, Christian R., Natalucci, Giancarlo, Relly, Christa, Riedel, Thomas, Aebi, Christoph, Berger, Christoph, Agyeman, Philipp K. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease. Aim To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Methods Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals. Results We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57–63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31–39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61–69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37–50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity ( p  
ISSN:2731-944X
2731-944X
DOI:10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1