Early viral reactivation despite excellent immune reconstitution following haploidentical Bone marrow transplant with post‐transplant cytoxan for sickle cell disease

Background Haploidentical bone marrow transplant (haplo‐BMT) offers near universal donor availability as a curative modality for individuals with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). However, the required intense immunodepletion is associated with increased infectious complications. A paucity of data e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplant infectious disease 2020-02, Vol.22 (1), p.e13222-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Dilan A., Dhedin, Nathalie, Chen, Heidi, Karnik, Leena, Gatwood, Katie, Culos, Katie, Mohan, Sanjay, Engelhardt, Brian G., Kitko, Carrie, Connelly, Jim, Satyanarayana, Gowri, Jagasia, Madan, De La Fuente, Josu, Kassim, Adetola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Haploidentical bone marrow transplant (haplo‐BMT) offers near universal donor availability as a curative modality for individuals with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). However, the required intense immunodepletion is associated with increased infectious complications. A paucity of data exists on immune reconstitution following haplo‐BMT for SCD. Methods A multi‐institution learning collaborative was developed in the context of a phase II clinical trial of a non‐myeloablative, related haplo‐BMT with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide for SCD. We report results from a cohort of 23 patients for whom immune reconstitution data up to one year were available. Results Median age was 14.8 years. Out of 23, 18 participants received pre‐conditioning with azathioprine, hydroxyurea, and hypertransfusions. 70% (16/23) of participants had multiple indications for haplo‐BMT. We observed excellent immune reconstitution of CD4, CD8, CD19, and CD56 cellular subsets by 6 months post transplant. Engraftment rate and event‐free survival in this cohort were 100% and 96%, respectively. 70% (16/23) of patients had at least one viral reactivation or infection, including CMV 35% (8/23), HHV‐6 22% (5/23), and polyoma virus 17% (4/23), with no cases of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Conclusion Further prospective studies are needed to better characterize immune reconstitution and the immunologic basis for increased viral reactivation following haplo‐BMT with post‐transplant cyclophosphamide for SCD.
ISSN:1398-2273
1399-3062
DOI:10.1111/tid.13222