Image quality of coronary CT angiography at ultra low tube voltage reconstructed with a deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm in patients of different weight

GE Healthcare's new generation of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR), the Revolution Apex CT is the first CT image reconstruction engine based on a deep neural network to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It can generate high-quality CT images that restore the tru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 2023-06, Vol.13 (6), p.3891-3901
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Lijuan, Ha, Ruoshui, Machida, Haruhiko, Shi, Xiaomeng, Wang, Fang, Chen, Kemin, Chen, Dazhi, Cao, Yongpei, Shen, Yun, Yang, Lili
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:GE Healthcare's new generation of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR), the Revolution Apex CT is the first CT image reconstruction engine based on a deep neural network to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It can generate high-quality CT images that restore the true texture with a low radiation dose. The aim of the present study was to assess the image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 70 kVp with the DLIR algorithm as compared to the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) algorithm in patients of different weight. The study group comprised 96 patients who underwent CCTA examination at 70 kVp and were subdivided by body mass index (BMI) into normal-weight patients [48] and overweight patients [48]. ASiR-V40%, ASiR-V80%, DLIR-low, DLIR-medium, and DLIR-high images were obtained. The objective image quality, radiation dose, and subjective score of the two groups of images with different reconstruction algorithms were compared and statistically analyzed. In the overweight group, the noise of the DLIR image was lower than that of the routinely used ASiR-40%, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of DLIR (H: 19.15±4.31; M: 12.68±2.91; L: 10.59±2.32) was higher than that of the ASiR-40% reconstructed image (8.39±1.46), with statistically significant differences (all P values
ISSN:2223-4292
2223-4306
DOI:10.21037/qims-22-1141