The Current Treatment Trends and Survival Patterns in Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB): A Multicenter Nationwide Study

In melanoma treatment, an approach following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recently deescalated from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) to active surveillance based on phase III trials data. In this study, we aim to evaluate treatment strategies in SLNB-positive melanoma p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2023-05, Vol.15 (10), p.2667
Hauptverfasser: Ziętek, Marcin, Teterycz, Paweł, Wierzbicki, Jędrzej, Jankowski, Michał, Las-Jankowska, Manuela, Zegarski, Wojciech, Piekarski, Janusz, Nejc, Dariusz, Drucis, Kamil, Cybulska-Stopa, Bożena, Łobaziewicz, Wojciech, Galwas, Katarzyna, Kamińska-Winciorek, Grażyna, Zdzienicki, Marcin, Sryukina, Tatsiana, Ziobro, Anna, Kluz, Agnieszka, Czarnecka, Anna M, Rutkowski, Piotr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In melanoma treatment, an approach following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recently deescalated from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) to active surveillance based on phase III trials data. In this study, we aim to evaluate treatment strategies in SLNB-positive melanoma patients in real-world practice. Five-hundred-fifty-seven melanoma SLNB-positive patients from seven comprehensive cancer centers treated between 2017 and 2021 were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox Proportional-Hazards Model were used for analysis. The median follow-up was 25 months. Between 2017 and 2021, the percentage of patients undergoing CLND decreased (88-41%), while the use of adjuvant treatment increased (11-51%). The 3-year OS and RFS rates were 77.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy prolonged RFS (HR:0.69, 0.036)), but CLND did not (HR:1.22, 0.272). There were no statistically significant differences in OS for either adjuvant systemic treatment or CLND. Lower progression risk was also found, and time-dependent hazard ratios estimation in patients treated with systemic adjuvant therapy was confirmed (HR:0.20, 0.002 for BRAF inhibitors and HR:0.50, 0.015 for anti-PD-1 inhibitors). Treatment of SLNB-positive melanoma patients is constantly evolving, and the role of surgery is currently rather limited. Whether CLND has been performed or not, in a group of SLNB-positive patients, adjuvant systemic treatment should be offered to all eligible patients.
ISSN:2072-6694
2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers15102667