Obesity as an independent risk factor for COVID‐19 severity and mortality
Background Since December 2019, the world has struggled with the COVID‐19 pandemic. Even after the introduction of various vaccines, this disease still takes a considerable toll. In order to improve the optimal allocation of resources and communication of prognosis, healthcare providers and patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2023-05, Vol.2023 (6), p.CD015201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Since December 2019, the world has struggled with the COVID‐19 pandemic. Even after the introduction of various vaccines, this disease still takes a considerable toll. In order to improve the optimal allocation of resources and communication of prognosis, healthcare providers and patients need an accurate understanding of factors (such as obesity) that are associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes from the COVID‐19 infection.
Objectives
To evaluate obesity as an independent prognostic factor for COVID‐19 severity and mortality among adult patients in whom infection with the COVID‐19 virus is confirmed.
Search methods
MEDLINE, Embase, two COVID‐19 reference collections, and four Chinese biomedical databases were searched up to April 2021.
Selection criteria
We included case‐control, case‐series, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and secondary analyses of randomised controlled trials if they evaluated associations between obesity and COVID‐19 adverse outcomes including mortality, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospitalisation, severe COVID, and COVID pneumonia. Given our interest in ascertaining the independent association between obesity and these outcomes, we selected studies that adjusted for at least one factor other than obesity. Studies were evaluated for inclusion by two independent reviewers working in duplicate.
Data collection and analysis
Using standardised data extraction forms, we extracted relevant information from the included studies. When appropriate, we pooled the estimates of association across studies with the use of random‐effects meta‐analyses. The Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool provided the platform for assessing the risk of bias across each included study. In our main comparison, we conducted meta‐analyses for each obesity class separately. We also meta‐analysed unclassified obesity and obesity as a continuous variable (5 kg/m2 increase in BMI (body mass index)). We used the GRADE framework to rate our certainty in the importance of the association observed between obesity and each outcome. As obesity is closely associated with other comorbidities, we decided to prespecify the minimum adjustment set of variables including age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease for subgroup analysis.
Main results
We identified 171 studies, 149 of which were included in meta‐analyses. As compared to 'normal' BMI (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2) or patients without obes |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-1858 1469-493X 1465-1858 1469-493X |
DOI: | 10.1002/14651858.CD015201 |