Reproducibility of the principal component analysis (PCA)‐based data‐driven respiratory gating on texture features in non‑small cell lung cancer patients with 18F‑FDG PET/CT

Objective Texture analysis is one of the lung cancer countermeasures in the field of radiomics. Even though image quality affects texture features, the reproducibility of principal component analysis (PCA)‐based data‑driven respiratory gating (DDG) on texture features remains poorly understood. Henc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2023-05, Vol.24 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Fukai, Shohei, Daisaki, Hiromitsu, Ishiyama, Mitsutomi, Shimada, Naoki, Umeda, Takuro, Motegi, Kazuki, Ito, Ryoma, Terauchi, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Texture analysis is one of the lung cancer countermeasures in the field of radiomics. Even though image quality affects texture features, the reproducibility of principal component analysis (PCA)‐based data‑driven respiratory gating (DDG) on texture features remains poorly understood. Hence, this study aimed to clarify the reproducibility of PCA‐based DDG on texture features in non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with 18F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Methods Twenty patients with NSCLC who underwent 18F‐FDG PET/CT in routine clinical practice were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient's PET data were reconstructed in two PET groups of no gating (NG‐PET) and PCA‐based DDG gating (DDG‐PET). Forty‐six image features were analyzed using LIFEx software. Reproducibility was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc${\rho _c}$) and percentage difference (%Diff). Non‐reproducibility was defined as having unacceptable strength (ρc$({\rho _c}$ 10%. NG‐PET and DDG‐PET were compared using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Results A total of 3/46 (6.5%) image features had unacceptable strength, and 9/46 (19.6%) image features had a %Diff of >10%. Significant differences between the NG‐PET and DDG‐PET groups were confirmed in only 4/46 (8.7%) of the high %Diff image features. Conclusion Although the DDG application affected several texture features, most image features had adequate reproducibility. PCA‐based DDG‐PET can be routinely used as interchangeable images for texture feature extraction from NSCLC patients.
ISSN:1526-9914
1526-9914
DOI:10.1002/acm2.13967