Diagnostic accuracy of WHO screening criteria to guide lateral-flow lipoarabinomannan testing among HIV-positive inpatients: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

•WHO screening criteria and alternative screening tools to guide AlereLAM and FujiLAM testing have suboptimal diagnostic accuracy in HIV-positive medical inpatients.•Thus, AlereLAM testing should be implemented in all HIV-positive medical inpatients alongside routine molecular diagnostic testing.•If...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infection 2022-07, Vol.85 (1), p.40-48
Hauptverfasser: Dhana, Ashar, Hamada, Yohhei, Kengne, Andre P, Kerkhoff, Andrew D, Broger, Tobias, Denkinger, Claudia M, Rangaka, Molebogeng X, Gupta-Wright, Ankur, Fielding, Katherine, Wood, Robin, Huerga, Helena, Rücker, Sekai Chenai Mathabire, Bjerrum, Stephanie, Johansen, Isik S, Thit, Swe Swe, Kyi, Mar Mar, Hanson, Josh, Barr, David A, Meintjes, Graeme, Maartens, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•WHO screening criteria and alternative screening tools to guide AlereLAM and FujiLAM testing have suboptimal diagnostic accuracy in HIV-positive medical inpatients.•Thus, AlereLAM testing should be implemented in all HIV-positive medical inpatients alongside routine molecular diagnostic testing.•If commercially available, FujiLAM could substantially improve detection of tuberculosis. WHO recommends urine lateral-flow lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) testing with AlereLAM in HIV-positive inpatients only if screening criteria are met. We assessed the performance of WHO screening criteria and alternative screening tests/strategies to guide LF-LAM testing and compared diagnostic accuracy of the WHO AlereLAM algorithm (WHO screening criteria followed by AlereLAM if screen positive) with AlereLAM and FujiLAM (a novel LF-LAM test) testing in all HIV-positive inpatients. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from Jan 1, 2011 to March 1, 2020 for studies among adult/adolescent HIV-positive inpatients regardless of tuberculosis signs and symptoms. The reference standards were (1) AlereLAM or FujiLAM for screening tests/strategies and (2) culture or Xpert for AlereLAM/FujiLAM. We determined proportion of inpatients eligible for AlereLAM using WHO screening criteria; assessed accuracy of WHO criteria and alternative screening tests/strategies to guide LF-LAM testing; compared accuracy of WHO AlereLAM algorithm with AlereLAM/FujiLAM testing in all; and determined diagnostic yield of AlereLAM, FujiLAM, and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert). We estimated pooled proportions with a random-effects model, assessed diagnostic accuracy using random-effects bivariate models, and assessed diagnostic yield descriptively. We obtained data from all 5 identified studies (n = 3,504). The pooled proportion of inpatients eligible for AlereLAM using WHO criteria was 93% (95%CI 91, 95). Among screening tests/strategies to guide LF-LAM testing, WHO criteria, C-reactive protein (≥5 mg/L), and CD4 count (
ISSN:0163-4453
1532-2742
DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2022.05.010