The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy and systemic therapy in the management of tumour thrombus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Background Outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and tumour thrombus remain poor. Recent data suggest limited role for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and data on thrombus response to systemic therapy (ST) is scarce. Here, we describe response and survival of patients with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of cancer 2023-05, Vol.128 (10), p.1888-1896
Hauptverfasser: Mittal, Abhenil, Al-Ezzi, Esmail, Li, Xuan, Moloney, Brian, Wilson, Brooke, Spiliopoulou, Pavlina, Sridhar, Srikala, Fallah-Rad, Nazanin, Chung, Peter, Hamilton, Robert James, O’malley, Martin, Hansen, Aaron R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and tumour thrombus remain poor. Recent data suggest limited role for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and data on thrombus response to systemic therapy (ST) is scarce. Here, we describe response and survival of patients with de novo mRCC and thrombi treated with ST with or without CN. Methods Demographics, disease characteristics and survival of patients with de novo mRCC were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in months (m) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method (log-rank). Results Between 2002 and 2019, 226 patients with mRCC were identified, 64 (28.3%) had tumour thrombus out of which 18 (28.1%) received only ST. Among 12 evaluable patients, thrombus response, stability and progression were seen in 3 (25%), 6 (50%) and 3 (25%) patients, respectively. Median OS was similar for patients with and without tumour thrombus treated with systemic therapy alone [OS: 12.1 m (8.8–27.7) vs. 13.9 m (7.9–21.5), p  = 0.87]. CN predicted for better OS in patients with tumour thrombus [OS: 29.4 m (17.4–48.9) vs. 12.1 m (8.8–27.7), p  = 0.01]. Conclusion In this retrospective series of patients with mRCC and tumour thrombus, addition of CN to ST improved outcomes. Validation of these findings with contemporary regimens is needed.
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/s41416-023-02166-5