Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer

Background Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013-02, Vol.2013 (2), p.CD006041
Hauptverfasser: De Caluwé, Laura, Van Nieuwenhove, Yves, Ceelen, Wim P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activity in rectal cancer. Objectives To compare preoperative RT with preoperative CRT in patients with resectable stage II and III rectal cancer. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase.com, and Pubmed from 1975 until June 2012. A manual search was performed of Ann Surg, Arch Surg, Cancer, J Clin Oncol, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and the proceedings of ASTRO, ECCO and ASCO from 1990 until June 2012. Selection criteria Relevant studies randomized resectable stage II or III rectal cancer patients to at least one arm of preoperative RT alone or at least one arm of preoperative CRT. Data collection and analysis Primary outcome parameters included overall survival (OS) at 5 years and local recurrence (LR) rate at 5 years. Secondary outcome parameters included disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years, metastasis rate, pathological complete response rate, clinical response rate, sphincter preservation rate, acute toxicity, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and anastomotic leak rate. Outcome parameters were summarized using the Odds Ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model. Main results Five trials were identified and included in the meta‐analysis. From one of the included trials only preliminary data are reported. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly increased grade III and IV acute toxicity (OR 1.68‐10, P = 0.002) and marginally affected postoperative overall morbidity (OR 0.67‐1.00, P = 0.05) while no differences were observed in postoperative mortality or anastomotic leak rate. Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT significantly increased the rate of complete pathological response (OR 2.12‐5.84, P < 0.00001) although this did not translate into a higher sphincter preservation rate (OR 0.92‐1.30, P = 0.32). The incidence of local recurrence at five years was significantly lower in the CRT group compared to RT alone (OR 0.39‐0.72, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in DFS (OR 0.92‐1.34, P = 0.27) or OS (OR 0.79‐1.14, P = 0.58) at five years. Authors' conclusions Compared to preoperative RT alone, preope
ISSN:1465-1858
1465-1858
1469-493X
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006041.pub3