Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for echocardiography 1 – 3 , although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature (London) 2023-04, Vol.616 (7957), p.520-524
Hauptverfasser: He, Bryan, Kwan, Alan C., Cho, Jae Hyung, Yuan, Neal, Pollick, Charles, Shiota, Takahiro, Ebinger, Joseph, Bello, Natalie A., Wei, Janet, Josan, Kiranbir, Duffy, Grant, Jujjavarapu, Melvin, Siegel, Robert, Cheng, Susan, Zou, James Y., Ouyang, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for echocardiography 1 – 3 , although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer initial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to evaluate the impact of AI in the interpretation workflow. The primary end point was the change in the LVEF between initial AI or sonographer assessment and final cardiologist assessment, evaluated by the proportion of studies with substantial change (more than 5% change). From 3,769 echocardiographic studies screened, 274 studies were excluded owing to poor image quality. The proportion of studies substantially changed was 16.8% in the AI group and 27.2% in the sonographer group (difference of −10.4%, 95% confidence interval: −13.2% to −7.7%, P  
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/s41586-023-05947-3