Eight‐year outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier‐Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valve

Introduction The Carpentier‐Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valve is a third‐generation bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This is a postapproval study reporting on its 8‐year outcomes. Methods Adults undergoing AVR with the Magna Ease valve between October 2007 and December 2012 were en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac surgery 2022-12, Vol.37 (12), p.4999-5010
Hauptverfasser: Tsui, Steven, Rosenbloom, Michael, Abel, James, Swanson, Jeffrey, Haverich, Axel, Zacharias, Joseph, Schorlemmer, Gilbert, Cohen, Gideon, Moulton, Michael, Lange, Rüdiger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The Carpentier‐Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease valve is a third‐generation bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR). This is a postapproval study reporting on its 8‐year outcomes. Methods Adults undergoing AVR with the Magna Ease valve between October 2007 and December 2012 were enrolled for this prospective, nonrandomized, single‐arm, and multicenter study. Assessments occurred preoperatively, at hospital discharge, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter for up to 8 years. Outcomes included safety endpoints, hemodynamic performance, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Results Of the 258 study patients, 67.5% were in NYHA Class I or II, and 32.5% were in NYHA Class III or IV at baseline. Concomitant procedures were performed in 44.2%. Total follow‐up was 1597.6 patient‐years, and median follow‐up was 7 years (interquartile range: 5.5–8.0 years). Eight years following AVR, the functional class remained improved from baseline with 93.9% in NYHA Class I/II and 6.1% in NYHA Class III; 38 deaths had occurred, 8 of which were valve related; freedom from all‐cause mortality was 80.7% (95% confidence intervals: 74.9, 86.4); freedom from valve‐related mortality was 95.8% (92.8, 98.8); freedom from reintervention, explant, major bleeding events, and structural valve deterioration was 89.8% (85.1, 94.6), 94.8% (91.7, 97.9), 85.1% (80.0, 90.1), and 90.1% (84.7, 95.4), respectively; effective orifice area was 1.5 ± 0.5 cm2, the mean gradient was 14.8 ± 8.3 mmHg, and 88.6% of patients had no or trivial aortic regurgitation. Conclusions This study demonstrated satisfactory safety and sustained hemodynamic and functional improvements at 8 years following AVR with the Magna Ease valve.
ISSN:0886-0440
1540-8191
DOI:10.1111/jocs.17140