Differences In Lung Fluid Quality Between Decompensated Heart Failure Patients And Covid-19 Patients- Results Of The Impedance-corona Trial

Hospitalized COVID-19 patients commonly develop pulmonary complications and respiratory insufficiency. Prediction of respiratory deterioration in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is an unmet goal. To assess monitoring of lung fluid status of hospitalized COVID-19 patients to predict respiratory deteri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac failure 2023-04, Vol.29 (4), p.598-598
Hauptverfasser: Shochat, Michael Kleiner, Mohsen, Jameel, Hellou, Elias, Kobo, Ofer, Meisel, Simcha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hospitalized COVID-19 patients commonly develop pulmonary complications and respiratory insufficiency. Prediction of respiratory deterioration in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is an unmet goal. To assess monitoring of lung fluid status of hospitalized COVID-19 patients to predict respiratory deterioration and prognosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406493. Study population comprised 51 patients hospitalized in Hillel Yaffe Medical Center with COVID-19 infection. Patient lung fluid status was monitored by repeat measurements of the lung impedance (LI), a technique found to be very effective for monitoring and guiding treatment of heart failure patients. Decreasing LI reflects lung fluid accumulation. Clinical and laboratory parameters, chest X-ray and LI level were recorded during hospitalization. Of 51 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection (37- men and 14- women, 55.7±12.6 years-old), 46 were discharged alive after successful treatment and of these 27 returned for follow-up evaluation 3-6 months after discharge. In these patients’ admission LI was 72.6±18.4 Ohms (Figure 1) and discharge LI was 83.8±20.7 Ohms, which is 15% higher than the admission value (p< 0.04). LI at the follow up visit was surprisingly low (63.7±15 Ohms), or 31.6% lower than discharge value (p
ISSN:1071-9164
1532-8414
DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.10.130