Implementing a home-based virtual hypertension programme—a pilot feasibility study

Abstract Introduction Implementing a health system-based hypertension programme may lower blood pressure (BP). Methods We performed a randomized, controlled pilot study to assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a home-based virtual hypertension programme integrating evidence-based strategi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family practice 2023-03, Vol.40 (2), p.414-422
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, Aditi, Ellis, Shellie D, Burkhardt, Crystal, Young, Kate, Mazzotti, Diego R, Mahnken, Jonathan, Abu-el-rub, Noor, Chandaka, Sravani, Comfort, Branden, Shanks, Denton, Woodward, Jennifer, Unrein, Amber, Anderson, Heidi, Loucks, Jennifer, Song, Xing, Waitman, Lemuel R, Burns, Jeffrey M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Implementing a health system-based hypertension programme may lower blood pressure (BP). Methods We performed a randomized, controlled pilot study to assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a home-based virtual hypertension programme integrating evidence-based strategies to overcome current barriers to BP control. Trained clinical pharmacists staffed the virtual collaborative care clinic (vCCC) to remotely manage hypertension using a BP dashboard and phone “visits” to monitor BP, adherence, side effects of medications, and prescribe anti-hypertensives. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were identified via electronic health records. Enrolled patients were randomized to either vCCC or usual care for 3 months. We assessed patients’ home BP monitoring behaviour, and patients’, physicians’, and pharmacists’ perspectives on feasibility and acceptability of individual programme components. Results Thirty-one patients (vCCC = 17, usual care = 14) from six physician clinics completed the pilot study. After 3 months, average BP decreased in the vCCC arm (P = 0.01), but not in the control arm (P = 0.45). The vCCC participants measured BP more (9.9 vs. 1.2 per week, P < 0.001). There were no intervention-related adverse events. Participating physicians (n = 6), pharmacists (n = 5), and patients (n = 31) rated all programme components with average scores of >4.0, a pre-specified benchmark. Nine adaptations in vCCC design and delivery were made based on potential barriers to implementing the programme and suggestions. Conclusion A home-based virtual hypertension programme using team-based care, technology, and a logical integration of evidence-based strategies is safe, acceptable, and feasible to intended users. These pilot data support studies to assess the effectiveness of this programme at a larger scale.
ISSN:1460-2229
0263-2136
1460-2229
DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmac084