Codon-specific KRAS mutations predict survival benefit of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer
Genomics has greatly improved how patients with cancer are being treated; however, clinical-grade genomic biomarkers for chemotherapies are currently lacking. Using whole-genome analysis of 37 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with the chemotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature medicine 2023-03, Vol.29 (3), p.605-614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Genomics has greatly improved how patients with cancer are being treated; however, clinical-grade genomic biomarkers for chemotherapies are currently lacking. Using whole-genome analysis of 37 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with the chemotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), we identified
KRAS
codon G12 (
KRAS
G12
) mutations as a potential biomarker of resistance. Next, we collected real-world data of 960 patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI and validated that
KRAS
G12
mutations were significantly associated with poor survival, also in analyses restricted to the
RAS
/
RAF
mutant subgroup. We next analyzed the data of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RECOURSE trial (
n
= 800 patients) and found that
KRAS
G12
mutations (
n
= 279) were predictive biomarkers for reduced overall survival (OS) benefit of FTD/TPI versus placebo (unadjusted interaction
P
= 0.0031, adjusted interaction
P
= 0.015). For patients with
KRAS
G12
mutations in the RECOURSE trial, OS was not prolonged with FTD/TPI versus placebo (
n
= 279; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.73–1.20;
P
= 0.85). In contrast, patients with
KRAS
G13
mutant tumors showed significantly improved OS with FTD/TPI versus placebo (
n
= 60; HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15–0.55;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-8956 1546-170X |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41591-023-02240-8 |