Antiangiogenic Effects of Camptothecin Analogues 9-Amino-20(S)-camptothecin, Topotecan, and CPT-11 Studied in the Mouse Cornea Model

Angiogenesis has been correlated with increased invasion and metastases in a variety of human neoplasms. Inadequate inhibition of the growth of tumor microvessels by anticancer agents may result in treatment failure, rated clinically as progressive or stable disease. We have investigated the antiangiogenic properties of three camptothecin analogues, 9-amino-20( S )-camptothecin, topotecan, and camptosar (CPT-11), currently under investigation in clinical settings. Angiogenesis was induced by basic fibroblast growth factor in the cornea of inbred Swiss-Webster mice, with the aim of exploring the suppression of neovascularization by the analogues injected into the mice daily over a period of 6 days. The dose range chosen is known to inhibit, in the mouse model, the growth of various human tumor xenografts or murine tumors. The statistical analysis evaluated the association between the area of neoangiogenesis and the dose of the drugs tested and correlated the effects with observed drug toxicity. It was established that, as the drug doses increased, the area of neovascularization decreased, appearing to approximate a negative exponential curve. 9-Amino-20( S )-camptothecin at 6.89 and 8.26 μmol/kg (2.5 and 3.0 mg/kg) and topotecan at 8.31 μmol/kg (3.5 mg/kg), both drugs being delivered over a 6-day period, had statistically significant reduction (47.2–72.5%) of neoangiogenesis and acceptable toxicity. At higher doses of the two analogues, toxic body-weight losses and deaths were observed. CPT-11 showed statistically significant reduction of neoangiogenesis at a dose of 359 μmol/kg (210 mg/kg) delivered over a 6-day course. Unlike camptothecin analogues, the nontoxic dose of vincristine did not induce a statistically significant inhibition of angiogenesis, and there was no dose-dependent escalation of antiangiogenic effects. The results indicate that camptothecins are most likely cytotoxic against two tumor compartments: in addition to tumor cells of epithelial origin, the drugs act against endothelial cells and prevent the growth of the tumor microvessels. We have hypothesized that treatment failure in some patients is due to incomplete or inadequate inhibition of the microvessel growth by camptothecins. Presumably, an intensive inhibition of the remaining tumor microvasculature in such patients could be achieved by combining a camptothecin with another antiangiogenic anticancer agent or with a highly selective angiogenic inhibitor exerting minimal dose-limit