Body composition by air-displacement plethysmography by using predicted and measured thoracic gas volumes
Departments of Nutrition and Exercise Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8669 The BOD POD, a new air-displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition, utilizes the inverse relationship between pressure and volume (Boyle's law) to measure body volume direc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physiology (1985) 1998-04, Vol.84 (4), p.1475-1479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Departments of Nutrition and Exercise Science, University of
California, Davis, California 95616-8669
The BOD POD, a
new air-displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body
composition, utilizes the inverse relationship between pressure and
volume (Boyle's law) to measure body volume directly. The quantity of
air in the lungs during tidal breathing, the average thoracic gas
volume (Vtg), is also measured by the BOD POD by using a standard
plethysmographic technique. Alternatively, the BOD POD provides the use
of a predicted Vtg (Vtg pred ).
The validity of using Vtg pred in
place of measured Vtg (Vtg meas )
to determine the percentage of body fat (%BF) was evaluated in 50 subjects (36 women, 14 men; ages 18-56 yr). There was
no significant difference between
Vtg meas and
Vtg pred (mean difference ± SE, 53.5 ± 63.3 ml) nor in %BF by using
Vtg meas vs.
Vtg pred (0.2 ± 0.2 %BF). On
an individual basis, %BF measured by using
Vtg meas vs.
Vtg pred differed within ±2.0%
BF for 82% of the subjects; maximum differences were 2.9 to
+3.0% BF. For comparison, data from 24 subjects who had undergone
hydrostatic weighing were evaluated for the validity of using predicted
vs. measured residual lung volume
(V R pred vs.
V R meas ,
respectively). Differences between V R meas and
V R pred and
in %BF calculated by using
V R meas vs.
V R pred were
significant (187 ± 46 ml and 1.4 ± 0.3% BF, respectively; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.4.1475 |