Psychological Predictors of Glycemic Change with Relaxation Training in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes mellitus

Background: Previous findings are unclear regarding the possible glycémie benefits of applying behavioral relaxation training in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Methods: Subjects with NIDDM were randomized to relaxation training (6 sessions of progressive muscle relaxation and image...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychotherapy and psychosomatics 1997-01, Vol.66 (6), p.302-306
Hauptverfasser: Aikens, James E., Kiolbasa, Theresa A., Sobel, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Previous findings are unclear regarding the possible glycémie benefits of applying behavioral relaxation training in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Methods: Subjects with NIDDM were randomized to relaxation training (6 sessions of progressive muscle relaxation and imagery, n = 12) or control treatment (routine medical care, n = 10). Physiological measures were total glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) and area under the 2-hour oral-glucose-tolerance curve (AUC). Psychological measures of generalized distress, anxiety and daily stress were also administered. All subjects were assessed before and after the 8-week intervention, and again at 16 weeks of long-term follow-up. Results: There were no postintervention group differences in physiological variables. Highly distressed subjects and those who rated their glucose as more stress responsive tended to practice relaxation less between sessions. Within the treated group only, lower preintervention stress responsivity was associated with greater improvement in GHb, and lower anxiety and distress levels predicted long-term improvement in AUC. Conclusions: It remains unclear whether relaxation training produces glycémie benefits in NIDDM. Perhaps the least anxious and stress-responsive patients only benefit from group-based relaxation training, whereas anxious individuals require intensive individually administered interventions.
ISSN:0033-3190
1423-0348
DOI:10.1159/000289152